[MD] in defence of the "relative"

[John Carl]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:07 AM, X Acto <xacto at rocketmail.com> wrote:

> Marsha,
> Just can't honor your own agreements can you?
> I thought we agreed to stop posting for today?
>
>
The urge to metaphysicise is as irresistible as drinking and dancing, Ron.

Deal with it.


> But if you want to take RMP literally, when he refers to DQ as a constant
> then the literal definition of a constant is "changeless". But we all
> understand
> that DQ isn't changeless, in fact DQ is everchanging.


Man has He introduced me to some changes, with hints of more on the way.

 He?

I'm personifying DQ as a "He"?  Not only a person, but a male person at
that.  How patriarchal.  How ignorant.  I can hear the howls of protest.

And yet.  I do.  And for a defensible reason too.

Because of a dream, that's why.

That's right, I met Deganidah-Quetzecoatl in a dream, a long time ago.  I
didn't know who it was at the time, but now I do.  The story is unfolding
before my very eyes.

Heya, and yours too.  Lucky you!