[MD] MOQ and the Future: An Inquiry into Usefulness

[plattholden at gmail.com]

On 13 Nov 2009 at 9:11, Arlo Bensinger wrote:

> [Platt to Craig]
> Actually it answers the question "Why?" by saying without value we 
> wouldn't be here to recognize reality much less ask "Why?".
> 
> [Arlo]
> Are you seriously suggesting that the "reason" subatomic particles 
> value their attractions is to make the cosmos "recognizable" or 
> "habitable" by human beings? Was their a meeting of quarks to decide 
> to do this? Or were they commanded to do this by Qualigod?
> 
> Q: Why do subatomic particles value certain attractions?
> A: So  that people would be here to ask "why?".
> 
> How lucky I am that billions and billions of years ago, these quarks 
> were concerned about this.

We all know your answer to why you or anybody else is here. It's 

"Oops." Things just happen for no reason at all.