[MD] MOQ and the Future: An Inquiry into Usefulness
plattholden at gmail.com
plattholden at gmail.com
Sat Nov 14 08:34:12 PST 2009
Whatever.
On 14 Nov 2009 at 10:57, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote:
> [Platt]
> There's nothing to "justify." It's all there in black and white, plain as day.
>
> [Arlo]
> You are saying that in LILA, its there and black and white, the support for
> your assertion that the reason quarks evidence value preference is so "man" has
> a recognizable cosmos?
>
> Wow.
>
> I suppose this holds true for everything? Or is there something that exercises
> value preference NOT for the sake and glory of "man"?
>
> [Platt]
> Since you feel the need to "deconstruct" and spin it to reinforce your dogma of
> creation-by-fluke, so be it. Far be it for me to dissuade you from your faith.
>
> [Arlo]
> I don't think I can name one rhetorical trick that is not in this beauty.
> Kudos. One of the books.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list