[MD] MOQ and the Future: An Inquiry into Usefulness

[ARLO J BENSINGER JR]

[Ron]
Seems to me you are splitting hairs as not to agree with Arlo about anything.
Cutting off ones nose to spite their own face so to speak.

[Arlo]
Heh. Yeah, I thought this too. You would think Mr. Freedom would understand
that without "freedom" to create as a response TO Quality, there is no
"freedom" in the MOQ, or rather there is no MOQ.

I think the reason Platt is schizo about being a "I'm-not-a-theist Theist" is
that he finds a world where there was no greater reason for him being here
scary. Certainly Quality had to create him for a purpose, even if it simply to
antagonize Arlo. What's sad, is that if this IS the case, the MOQ is wrong.

Instead, the beauty of the MOQ is precisely the freedom to respond to DQ, the
free value expression evident from the smallest quarks to the large patterns of
intellect. And it is this "freedom" that denies any orchestration, any "plan",
any act of "creation" by a "source".