[MD] MOQ and the Future: An Inquiry into Usefulness

[X Acto]

John,
Damn, .. on that sumbtch.

 shuttn me down 

cant retort on that one! nice!
-Ron


----- Original Message ----
From: John Carl <ridgecoyote at gmail.com>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Mon, November 16, 2009 2:11:39 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] MOQ and the Future: An Inquiry into Usefulness

I know the answer to this one, Ron;


Back to the question, how do you know Pirsig better than your self?
>
>
Because Pirsig is only  static stack of words, but Platt is an ongoing,
evolving, dynamic individual.  It's always easier to understand a static
self than a dynamic one.


John the explicator of duh-ness
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/