[MD] Emotions

[Andre Broersen]

Squonk to Andre:
A critical thinker may note here that, ?It is RMP?s interpretation that??

Andre:
I thought we were discussing the MoQ, Squonk, which is RMP's creation.
I value his interpretation very highly and certainly do not feel
equipped to challenge him at this stage.

Squonk:
This assumes the realm of the conceptually unknown to be appreciable
of an aesthetic. Most of it may be, but some of it may not be?
For example, many undifferentiated experiences are low quality, which
may suggest there to be ?quality free? experiences.

Andre:
Not sure what you mean here...'quality free' experiences. Are you now
using quality as an adjective? Any examples?

Squonk:
'...Humans have to be doing something in order to occupy themselves'

'DQ is never directly experienced'.

Andre:
Says who Squonk? Are you projecting? When's the last time you read
ZMM? Or Lila for that matter. Had sex, listened to Rachmaninov's 3rd
piano concerto, saw a painting, went for a walk, saw a sunset, saw a
baby, etc, etc, etc.?

DQ is 'pure' experience, the word 'directly' is superfluous

The first split is DQ/SQ. DQ, unpatterned experience/ SQ, patterned
experience, analogues upon analogues upon analogues at all levels.

Imho
Andre