[MD] British Emergentism

[ARLO J BENSINGER JR]

[Platt]
Now comes the predictable ad hominem attack, the last refuge of a loser. One
would expect better on a site devoted to Quality. But alas . . .   

[Arlo]
There was and is no "ad hominem" here, this is clearly just evasion. I simply
pointed out you, once again, were not responding to ANY substantive point and
simply using the Pee Wee device (calling me a "theist" in an argument where
I've demonstrated your theism). I can see you desperation here, Platt, and I
have to ask, would it not be better to try to learn something than play your
ridiculous games of evasion?

When, and if, you are ready to address just one of the substantive points I've
been making, please let me know.

You can start with this. ALL "patterns" are responses to Quality. That is what
patterns "are"; stable value responses to Quality. Do you deny this? Can you
tell me any pattern you feel is NOT the result of stable value preferences to
Quality?