[MD] The relativity of the MoQ

[plattholden at gmail.com]

On 5 Sep 2009 at 20:12, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote:

> [Platt]
> No evasion, a statement of fact.
> 
> [Arlo]
> No, its nothing BUT obvious evasion. You made a moronic statement, ignored
> Ron's substantive point (still doing this), and have turned the issue into my
> being 'mean' for pointing out the moronic squalking you continue to inject into
> this otherwise intellectual forum. Evasion.

No. Fact.

> Am I "hateful"? Oh, boo fucking hoo. Yeah, your moronic nonsense ("death
> panels", "captive audiences", etc.) embarrasses me, us, and I hate that. I do.

We agree you're hateful. Maybe we're making progress.

> [Platt]
> Yes, we know. From your exalted throne in your ivory tower you look down on
> regular working people as a bunch of stupid yahoos. Your sanctimonious elitism
> never ceases to amaze.  
> 
> [Arlo]
> Riiiiight. From my "exalted throne". Not yahoos. Misinformed. And lied to. And
> riled up by the most evil, hateful, distortive rhetoric and hyberbole
> imaginable. Any idiot can whip up a mob, as the talk-radio morons have figured
> out. But that's not rocket science. I can point out any number of historical
> figures who figured out how to incite an angry mob. 

Obozo being a classic idiot in point, inciting anger against the Bush 
administration with the help of sycophants like you. . 

> [Platt]
> The provisions are NOT the same. Look it up. 
> 
> [Arlo]
> Oh, I HAVE. And they are functionally identical. Can you point out the
> instances you think they differ? They both cover end-of-life counseling in the
> exact same manner. But I'll wait for you to point out the passages you think
> reveal a difference. Can you? Betcha can't.

Identical? Prove it. Betcha can't. And don't try to weasle out with words 
like "functionally" and "same manner."

> [Platt]
> Nor was there an Obozo health care czar who promotes a "level of productivity"
> to determine individual access to medical care.
> 
> [Arlo]
> More hyperbole. Sad.

Prove it. Betcha can't. 

> [Platt]
> Rhetoric justified by Obozo's lesson plan asking grade schoolers to write an
> essay on how they can "serve the president."
> 
> [Arlo]
> So its only "wrong" if its not YOUR message? What a fucking idiot. Jeezuz, I
> can only imagine the sanctimonius patriotism if people called Hannity about
> Bush's school address and said they won't allow their kid to go to school
> because they don't want their kid subjected to Bush's war rhetoric. 
> 
> But this is the real issue. Its not about "Obama speaking to a captive
> audience", its that its not YOUR ideologue speaking to the captive audience. 

The real issue is Obozo's attempt to make kids believe they should 
serve the chosen one, the party leader, Obozo. I'm surprised he's not 
also passing out little brown shirts. A blatant attempt to brainwash kids 
with radical leftist ideology? 

You betcha.