[MD] MOQ would seems to imply that above human intelligence computers
John Carl
ridgecoyote at gmail.com
Sat Apr 17 17:34:10 PDT 2010
Hi horse, I'm trying lu's iPad, on the road.
the typing sucks. we'll keep it short...
I say,
> You've obviously been reading too much Sci Fi.
You reply:
> Not really, I have a degree in Artificial Intelligence and my third year dissertation/paper/project (whatever) was in Artificial Life. That was in 1993 around the same time that ALife was starting up and I've been keeping up with it (more or less - it's become a substantial area of computer science) ever since.
I say,
> I suggest you try something
> a bit deeper, something by Roger Penrose
>
You reply,
> Penrose's arguments (especially those in "The Emperors New Mind" - the one that specifically targets AI) were unravelled and dismissed a long time ago - I read it when it came out and thought it was a pretty poor read.
And then you have the gall to top it all off with,
> Cheers
>
I can see that this argument is not going to go my way at all. :-)
But I'm pretty interested in the gist of why you think Penrose is wrong.
Humbly yours,
Mc
"
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list