[MD] Stacks

[skutvik at online.no]

Andy and Magnus

31 July Andy wrote:

> Magnus toward Bo:
> > You're speaking from the human perspective stack now. In the
> > universal stack, social patterns are very much dependent on gravity.
> > Cities resides on the ground, they're not flying around mid air. So
> > social events that happen to social patterns must always take
> > gravity into account because of this dependency.

> Right! It would be terribly immoral to disregard gravity when working
> in higher levels. For example, consider the extremely antisocial act
> of defenestration.

I leave the stack issue to you two. Magnus response was so "yxskaft"-
ish" (he will know what it means) that no reply is possible. And your 
comment is just an echo of his non-understanding - even adding some 
more irrelevance if possible. "Immoral to disregard gravity" LOL! I just 
referred to the campfire talk in ZAMM that carries the deep insight that 
a revolutionary physics theory changes the scientific outlook and as 
science - as part of intellect - is the top notch it has ramifications for all 
of society (not Q-society though) and - consequently - a metaphysical 
revolution revolutionizes everything. Get it?  

> The levels are integral. This is part of the lesson of the stack.
> Morality is optimized by considering each of the levels. To ignore any
> one level is to disintegrate morality.

The levels as integral I agree with, but they are also mutually exclusive 
(I'm not sure how Pirsig expressed it) the upper shying the lower as 
evil and the lower shying  the upper as destroyer of "order". The stack 
idea has always been part of the MOQ, that is, only from MOQ's meta-
level do we see the immense complexity beneath the whole static 
range.   


Bodvar