[MD] Bo's right! For all the wrong reasons? (Part1)

[craigerb at comcast.net]

"The difference
between these two points of view is philosophic,
not scientific. The question 
of whether an electron does a certain thing because
it has to or because it
wants to is completely irrelevant to the data of what
the electron does." (Pirsig)

[Dave]
> "the data of what the electron does", as
> uncovered and described by physics,
> is NOT based on some moral law of nature
> in force or ruling at the inorganic level as Pirsig
> claims. All of the laws and rules from physics
> to sociology under the MoQ are strictly
> SOM/SOL based and reside on the intellectual level.

Pirsig says the choice of description is scientifically
irrelevant. So it doesn't follow that if it's not
scientifically one, then it's the other.

Craig