[MD] now it comes

[skutvik at online.no]

For Krimel 

2 Aug. :

[Mary] had said:
> The problem is not with the word 'static'.  The problem is with the
> word 'concepts'. The levels are not 'concepts'. 

[Krimel]
> All words are concepts. Seriously, until you get this, you are just
> pissing in the wind.

Mary, does not deny the fact that words are concepts, she just says 
that the levels aren't concepts. I.e. that DMB's Jamesian "Dynamic 
Flux/Concepts" doesn't correspond to MOQ's "Dynamic/Static". 

Language is the sea we swim in and cannot be used as any 
metaphysical basics. The same goes for "human beings". We can 
postulate a time before language and a time before Homo Sapiens, 
but not as a basic divide like DMB's "Everything not 
language/Language"  or SOM's "Everything not subjective/Subjective". 
All such ends in paradoxes: All is conveyed by language, the objective 
is contained in the subject.

FYI

Bodvar