[MD] Social level for humans only
X Acto
xacto at rocketmail.com
Mon Aug 23 13:45:36 PDT 2010
There is no "you" in my mind
only bitter rhetoric and bullshit hypocritical opinions
Having the nerve to chastize someone elses illusions
and projections as dillusional while hoisting your own
as truth.
what an asshole
----- Original Message ----
From: MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Mon, August 23, 2010 4:34:25 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Social level for humans only
On Aug 23, 2010, at 4:32 PM, X Acto wrote:
>
>
> Marsha said:
>
>
> John,
>
> I'm not talking about what was said while quilting in a group, and I
> not talking about your psychological gender nonsense either.
> I'm talking about the power men used through the Church of Religion
> and the Church of Reason to define woman, and their place within
> society. Women were not even permitted to vote until the last
> century. Women can project valuable and interesting ideas too if
> they were not for centuries prohibited from doing so on threat of
> death.
>
> Your crack about 'neti, neti' is pure foolishness. It represents more
> than you understand, but of course, I get only what you project a
> woman might think. Probed and understood? Fuck probed and
> understood. Probe and understand your own illusions instead
> of erecting a tower of babel.
>
>
> Ron:
> Talk about hypocritical bullshit!
> " The power men used through the Church of Religion
> and the Church of Reason to define woman, and their place within
> society." illusion after illusion, projections of projections.
>
> Bitter and small.
Marsha:
Yes, Ron, I'm bitter and small in your mind.
>
> On Aug 23, 2010, at 2:49 PM, John Carl wrote:
>
>> Marsha said,
>>
>>
>>> Agree, but I don't know that women are privileged to be in the position to
>>> intellectualize (define) what men are like.
>>
>>
>>
>> From the dawn of time, women have sat in circles and done exactly that,
>> Marsha. And they probably get a lot closer to the truth of the matter than
>> men would find comfortable.
>>
>> While men, when they get together, freely admit they don't understand women.
>> So undoubtedly there's differing approaches.
>>
>> For one example, it seems that men try much harder to put themselves out
>> there. Men are outwardly projectionistic, thrusting their ideas and
>> thoughts out at the world. Whereas women seem to relish being inward and
>> secretive and mysterious, going all "not this, not that" or "fuck your
>> questions" to avoid being probed and understood.
>>
>> Dan Bern's question, "do you like me, or are you ignoring me?" is a question
>> that takes balls to ask.
>>
>> Big balls.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ5t2Qr0q80
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
___
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list