[MD] Social level for humans only

[Krimel]

Dave
And this all ties in quite nicely with the section of Chalmers I'm reading.
He is making the point that in trying to understand how "consciousness"
might emerge and/or work that thinking at the level of the brain split into
self/other, inside/outside, subject/object is way, way, too coarse of a
distinction to understand cognitive processes of interrelationships and
dependencies. Hence the reason why SOM was doomed to failure from the start.

[Krimel]
Perhaps you can explain how bracketing consciousness off as a separate
ontological category does anything but make a worse mess than SOM.