[MD] Social level for humans only

[MarshaV]

On Aug 27, 2010, at 1:50 PM, David Thomas wrote:

> On 8/27/10 12:26 PM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> Chalmers is now the first and last word on everything MoQ and SOM.  Do none of
>> you understand patterns?
> 
> Intellectual progress (which you seem to deplore because somewhere RMP
> mentions "killing the intellect")  at the level of theories is dependent
> upon comparing and contrasting differing ideas. That is what is being done
> in this thread and the consciousness one. If it's so boring or degrading or
> whatever that is what the delete key is for.

Hello Dave T,  

         Adrie had written:
         Hence the reason why som cannot be the perfect umbrella for the intellectual
         level?  

This doesn't sound like simply comparing and contrasting.  It sounds like a 
final judgement.   


Marsha   



> 
> Possibly you could tackle the problem of reconciling "killing the intellect"
> with the intellectual level being the highest value stable patterns we
> humans have regular access to. And a one line not this-not that, or
> something having to do with mysticism and DQ is not an answer within the
> context of the arrangement and functioning of SQ.
> 
> Dave   


 
___