[MD] Able to change well.

[Magnus Berg]

Hi Ade

On 2010-08-28 13:27, schoadabyool at talktalk.net wrote:
>
> @ I'm not sure i have noticed this Magnus. Everyone here uses
> divisions all the time don't they? In fact, divisions are a precursor
> to being here in the first place, even for Frank.

Yes, everyone use divisions, but I think the MoQ can be used to show how 
reality really works, its ontology, not just how we perceive it.

> @ Thanks. You note that chemistry obeys static laws. So Oxygen has to
> behave in a certain way when in the presence of Hydrogen, and it
> can't do otherwise. Then you note there is another behaviour which
> chemicals can adopt, which is not restricted to the static laws of
> chemistry. You call this biology. The key seems to be a combination
> of static and freedom to choose, or free will as you call it. This
> chimes with Robert Pirsig's account it seems to me. But i still ask
> how? What is the interface between static and freedom?

Hmm.. it seems I must have missed what you mean by "how". Could you show 
me an example and point to the interface you ask about?

> I understand all this may be useless chatter for anyone who does not
> value theory. But i hope we can live side by side in any case.

Probably, but many other posts are useless chatter to us, at least me, 
but we have to, as you say, live with it.

	Magnus