[MD] SQ is the illusion

John Carl ridgecoyote at gmail.com
Sun Aug 29 15:15:53 PDT 2010


Hey Mary,

On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Mary <marysonthego at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> I've been away for a few weeks and see that some bad things have happened
> in
> my absence.  Maybe I'll say something about all that later on - assuming,
> of
> course, that my posts even make it to the list these days?
>

Well you're allowed to be as irritating as you want for at least 10 years,
and then you'll get a warning first, so I wouldn't worry if I were you.





> Anyway
>
> I am really grooving on your post here.  It's hard to comment on a post you
> agree with, you know?  Guess I could insert Yes! Or Well put! every few
> lines.  Much easier to argue.
>
>

I hear you.  It does seem to add to the quality of the overall dialogue
tho.  Like if we were leaning over the back fence, sharing a cup of coffee,
just a nod would comment that you agreed and it'd be redundant to restate
the thing... since we can't see each other in virtual world, it's good to
"hear" from you when you think a point expresses your view.




> For me, Static Patterns are not equivalent to fixed and eternal patterns.
> In my MOQ there's no such thing as fixed and eternal  patterns.  Patterns
> are static only in relation to the amount of time they persist.  The twist
> is that time itself is also just a static pattern.  So we have static
> patterns defined as such based only on their relationship to other static
> patterns.
>
>

Patterns are relatively static.  Ultimately, patterns are defined in
relation to their staticity.  Static from what perspective?  Their creation
or realization.  Where does their creation or realization arise from?  DQ!



> This is cool.  It's dangerous to make claims about DQ, but in an effort to
> progress conversation, I would say it is the only thing that is eternal.
>

Yeah, I know what you mean by "dangerous".  Atheists freak out when you
start throwing those kinds of terms around.  ... oh.  Wait.  You are one,
that's right.  :-)  To be sure, I'd say "eternal" is a conceptualization
generated by DQ.  But I gotta run right now.  Let's chat about this later.

John



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list