[MD] Able to change well.

[Magnus Berg]

Hi

On 2010-08-29 21:58, schoadabyool at talktalk.net wrote:
> Hello Magnus, May i ask you to consider how all this additional
> dynamism does not lead to chaos? I agree dynamism increases and yet
> things don't fly apart at the slightest touch. It seems to me there
> is an intuitive feeling that the more dynamic everything gets the
> more unstable everything would become, but it does not. I reckon the
> answer to this is homeostasis. If you are interested in processes you
> may find this useful? Homeostatic systems maintain themselves in a
> way that seems to balance static and dynamic functions. They work
> well in biology, and Jung uses the concept to explain psychic
> stability.

I didn't know about the term homeostasis, but it seems to be a fancy 
name for something pretty obvious. When life evolves, it must of course 
have a very wide base, it can't just grow upwards. So the result is a 
very stable pyramid, not a fragile skyskraper.

>> Jung correctly identified the possibility of a celebrity figure
>> capable of activating a shadow in the subconscious of Germany. In
>> the process a great many apparently individual psyche became
>> unified.
>
> Are we talking nazis now? I'm not that eager to expand quality events
> to whole countries. You can easily get lost in DQ since they are so
> dynamic. Of course it's possible, but you can just as well get it
> completely backwards.
>
>
> @ A country is its people and their culture. The trick to getting a
> grip on a whole people is to manipulate their culture. That is an
> easy thing to do if you are familiar with the relevant culture. Jung
> was familiar with the culture he analysed correctly.

I'm not sure I follow, or want to follow. You're actually being rather 
creepy.

> @ The connection with subatomic force could be analogous to
> complimentarity. Individuality could be viewed as a compliment to
> Archetypal shared unconsciousness.

Yes, same thing, different stacks.

	Magnus