[MD] Able to change well.
John Carl
ridgecoyote at gmail.com
Tue Aug 31 21:12:22 PDT 2010
Hello Ade, Platt,
>
> Hello Platt,
> You have stated it succinctly.
> Thank you sir.
>
>
John: I agree completely.
>
> The moq is very much not unique in applying an ability to judge in the
> manner you describe as i keep discovering.
> It's central to many beliefs, but rejected by modernity. I'll grant you
> that.
> Shopenhauer is rejected for the same reason for example, and his notion of
> the Universal Will is restricted to living things only by those who choose
> to take him seriously. It is Shopenhauer who spoke of magnets having a
> preference to do what they do, and it is also held by Aristotle that things
> fall to the ground because they prefer to do so.
> When Shopenhauer writes about the Universal Will, i do take him seriously.
> So when the moq says the same thing i take it seriously also.
>
>
John: I think you hit on a real key point there, about a certain congruence
Quality has, or rather a congruence of metaphysics toward Quality, that
keeps the MoQ from being unique - but in a good way.
>
> Because Robert Pirsig is ruminating his thoughts in the novel he doesn't
> list the possible sources that may have informed this thinking. Which i do
> not argue with and accept for what it is.
>
I believe his sources are pretty well explicated. In biographical form in
his novels, and in this forum a lot gets brought to light. He never claimed
to be a comprehensive scholar of philosophy, by any means. I think he came
to his insights in congruence with others, independently of knowing about
them, and in a way, that's a stronger affirmation of his thinking than if
he'd been aware of them before he started out.
>
>
> What is unique about the moq in my opinion is that it is an individuation
> of our commonly held heritage.
> If we connect to this as you say we have the opportunity to ripen as
> individuals.
>
>
This happens, yes. But I believe moreso in dialogue than individual
contemplation. I see it fundamentally as a social process, and thus the MoQ
as inextricably intertwined with MD.
Thanks for joining us and hope you stick around.
Schopenhauer! Yummm....
John
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list