[MD] Stuck on a Torn Slot

[MarshaV]

No Arlo, I doubt that you want other than to make a fool of me.  



On Dec 1, 2010, at 7:18 AM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote:

> [Pirsig]
> The defect is that subject-object science has no provision for morals.  ...Now
> that intellect was in command of society for the first time in history, was
> THIS the intellectual pattern it was going to run society with?"
> 
> [Marsha]
> Yes, science has the subject-object defect, as do all Intellectual static
> patterns of value...
> 
> [Arlo]
> Can you explain why your ideas about Intellect=SOM are better than Pirsig's
> ideas that Intellect!=SOM? Do you think your ideas have better explanatory
> power? Offer the possibility for better solutions? What does your MOQ offer
> that Pirsig's does not?
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___