[MD] static value

[MarshaV]

Hi Mark,

I'm not sure I can FULLY comprehend anything, let alone 
consciousness. I can watch bits and pieces of pattern 
pass through, and that demonstrates what they are not.    


Marsha   


On Dec 5, 2010, at 1:48 PM, 118 wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> 
> Yes, but the notion of levels is very easy to come to.  How is it that
> we can create a single consciousness with this body that is made up of
> lots of stuff?  It is quite possible that a consciousness exists at
> the social level that we can never fully understand, just like the
> cells of our body are not aware of our human consciousness.
> 
> Mark
> 
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:02 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Mark,
>> 
>> The whole area is interesting to me.  The level structure is, to my
>> mind, an intellectual pattern.  How would a level outside the
>> existing structure emerge?  It makes me dizzy, like trying to
>> explain watching patterns flow through consciousness or having
>> an unpatterned experience.   If a new level would play by
>> different rules, then ???.  I have more questions than answers.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 4, 2010, at 7:36 PM, 118 wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Marsha,
>>> I am fine with your description or analogy.  My question was more
>>> directed to what is required to create a new level, in general.  We
>>> have divided up the expression of Quality into several levels.  What
>>> creates the difference?
>>> 
>>> We can certainly consider this a static value at this point, since we
>>> are discussing a concept.  Of course the static value can change
>>> dynamically.  And I don't want to get into that right now.
>>> 
>>> That is the way I would pose the question.  You may have had a
>>> different idea with your starting this post.  I can always change how
>>> I respond.
>>> 
>>> Mark
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 1:28 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Dec 4, 2010, at 12:15 AM, 118 wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> A better question would be:  What is similar between all the divisions
>>>>> in levels?  What is the specific criteria which divides them, not each
>>>>> one, but in general?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Mark,
>>>> 
>>>> This would be an interesting topic.  I always thought that what can be
>>>> said of all patterns across all levels is that they are ever-changing,
>>>> impermanent, interdependent, and conceptually constructed.  What
>>>> do you think?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___


 
___