[MD] Philosophy and Abstraction
John Carl
ridgecoyote at gmail.com
Wed Dec 8 01:33:07 PST 2010
I'd say they'd also articulated a certain stubbornly obtuse evasion of
sincere philosophical discussion, Matt.
Their "I" wasn't being too faithful and their non-language an expression of
"not I" - as in, who wants to philosophize?
"Not I" being their answer.
John
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Matt Kundert
<pirsigaffliction at hotmail.com>wrote:
>
> Think about this way John: if you told someone that it was language
> all the way down, and they looked down at their feet and said they
> didn't see any language anywhere, they'd just articulated to you the
> sensitivity to context Steve and Rorty desire, and how the notion of
> "not language" still plays a role.
>
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list