[MD] Thus spoke Lila

[Arlo Bensinger]

[Marsha]
You reframed the issue from intellectual static patterns of value to concepts.

[Arlo]
Which points back to my question, are there "concepts" that are NOT 
"intellectual static patterns"? Or, are there "intellectual static 
patterns" that are not "concepts"?

Clearly you do not think the terms are the same. All I am asking for 
is clarity.

For the record, I didn't "reframe" anything.

You first used the expression "reified concepts", to which I asked if 
there was such a thing as "unreified concepts".

You responded, "Not "unreified' intellectual static (concepts) 
patterns of value."

So it was YOU who moved "reframed" this from "concepts" into 
"intellectual static patterns of value", and are now accusing me of 
"reframing" it back to "concepts". Ai yi yi.