[MD] Thus spoke Lila

[MarshaV]

On Dec 8, 2010, at 12:45 PM, Arlo Bensinger wrote:

> [Marsha]
> You reframed the issue from intellectual static patterns of value to concepts.
> 
> [Arlo]
> Which points back to my question, are there "concepts" that are NOT "intellectual static patterns"? Or, are there "intellectual static patterns" that are not "concepts"?
> 
> Clearly you do not think the terms are the same. All I am asking for is clarity.
> 
> For the record, I didn't "reframe" anything.
> 
> You first used the expression "reified concepts", to which I asked if there was such a thing as "unreified concepts".
> 
> You responded, "Not "unreified' intellectual static (concepts) patterns of value."
> 
> So it was YOU who moved "reframed" this from "concepts" into "intellectual static patterns of value", and are now accusing me of "reframing" it back to "concepts". Ai yi yi.
> 

Arlo,

I'm sorry, but I see nowhere for this discussion to proceed.  Thanks for your time.   


Marsha  


 
___