[MD] Thus spoke Lila

[MarshaV]

On Dec 16, 2010, at 2:49 PM, rapsncows at fastmail.fm wrote:

> Marsha,
>> Greetings Tim,
>> 
>> I would think that heart in connection with DQ would be beyond all 
>> static patterned boundaries.  Yet as DQ is always present whether it
>> is, to a greater or lesser degree, acknowledged.  
>> 
>> The definition and connotations of the word 'heart' have me at the 
>> moment stumped, but regardless, it instinctually seems a good direction.  
>> There is that awesome experience of having your "heart" expand...  
>> 
>> heart=biological
>> spirit=subjective   
>> 
>> ???  
>> 
>> Marsha
> 
> 
> [Tim]
> I'm not sure exactly why you brought 'heart' into this conversation.  If
> you want it to be 'biological' I can start to understand it from that
> perspective for you.  Perhaps I shouldn't have submitted to the term
> 'hearts and minds' either...?  Anyway, what I had been referring to was
> something else.  Something along the lines of the 'romantic' maybe.  A
> different kind of 'intellect' (as in intellectual level) from purely
> rational.  In fact, 'purely rational' may not ever be properly
> meaningful; what passes for it now, language (including math), always
> involves a 'starting in the middle'.
> 
> I'm not sure what you were getting at in equating spirit to subjective.
> 
> Tim
> -- 


Greetings,

I don't know much myself, but here heart is discussed much better than any 
of my words:  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bf6D5T-EVw  


Marsha 




 
___