[MD] Thus spoke Lila

[rapsncows at fastmail.fm]

Marsha,
> Greetings Tim,
> 
> I would think that heart in connection with DQ would be beyond all 
> static patterned boundaries.  Yet as DQ is always present whether it
> is, to a greater or lesser degree, acknowledged.  
> 
> The definition and connotations of the word 'heart' have me at the 
> moment stumped, but regardless, it instinctually seems a good direction.  
> There is that awesome experience of having your "heart" expand...  
> 
> heart=biological
> spirit=subjective   
> 
> ???  
> 
> Marsha


[Tim]
I'm not sure exactly why you brought 'heart' into this conversation.  If
you want it to be 'biological' I can start to understand it from that
perspective for you.  Perhaps I shouldn't have submitted to the term
'hearts and minds' either...?  Anyway, what I had been referring to was
something else.  Something along the lines of the 'romantic' maybe.  A
different kind of 'intellect' (as in intellectual level) from purely
rational.  In fact, 'purely rational' may not ever be properly
meaningful; what passes for it now, language (including math), always
involves a 'starting in the middle'.

I'm not sure what you were getting at in equating spirit to subjective.

Tim
-- 
  
  rapsncows at fastmail.fm

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - IMAP accessible web-mail