[MD] Decision

[Platt Holden]

On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Horse <horse at darkstar.uk.net> wrote:

> Hi Platt
>
>
> On 06/07/2010 00:07, Platt Holden wrote:
>
>> Hi Horse, All:
>>
>> After Pirsig specifically warned against issuing a Papal Bull, now we have
>> one.
>>
>>
>
> No - you have a considered decision made by the moderator of this forum.
> Twisting my decision for your own political ends is reprehensible.
>
>
>  A triumph for political correctness.
>>
>
> Nonsense - twisting for political manipulation more like.
>
>
>  A sad day for free speech.
>>
>>
>
> It would indeed be a sad day when I am prevented from running the forum
> that I have been running successfully for more than 10 years by those who
> wish to manipulate it for their own dishonest purposes.
>
>
>  Who would have imagined that a site guided by Dynamic Quality "whose only
>> perceived good is freedom" would come to this?
>>
>>
>
> So now deception, misrepresentation, lies and dishonesty are seen as Good.
> Who would have imagined such a truly desperate position? That truly would be
> a sad day if was perceived to be true.
>
> But why haven't you addressed the issues that I have brought up, like
> providing unequivocal evidence that Pirsig does support the SOL
> interpretation? Is it because none exists? Because Pirsig really doesn't
> support Bo?
> Or is it because it's easier to ignore the real issues of dishonesty and
> deception and try and divert attention away from them by blatant
> misrepresentation of the evidence which does exist showing that Pirsig most
> certainly does not support Bo's version of the MoQ.
>
> Why not stop playing games and provide the goods? You can't can you? All
> you can do is protest against fictitious positions of your own imagination.
>
> A very sad day indeed.
>

Hi Horse,

Twisting for political ends? More like intellect vs. social ends -- free
speech.

As for addressing the issues you brought up, many of us have presented the
evidence you ask for. You refuse to see it, Mary's latest post dated July 6
being a case in point.

Ignoring evidence comes as no surprise. But, to adopt the tactics of the
thought police -- shocking.

Platt