[MD] Decision
Matt Kundert
pirsigaffliction at hotmail.com
Thu Jul 8 10:33:26 PDT 2010
Heh, I had a feeling it _was_ a metaphor, but ya' know,
just in case there was some hardware issue. What the hell
do I know?
And I guess I'll reiterate since it isn't: delete the fucking
emails.
If you are too retarded to take the proper measures to
control your own psychic resources (and it took me a
while to learn how to do it), then maybe you aren't cut
out for talking to people. Because I still do not think it is
a good administrative move to take any action.
That's the thing I need clarification on and for which, Ian,
you didn't help very well at all. So, thanks for making me
repeat myself again.
What are we talking about? What options for _action_ are
we talking about? Administrative actions? Horse puts
down--as an administrator, and not as a regular poster--a
warning. What if Bo violates it? What are we talking about?
If it just involves asking Bo, "Please, shut the fuck up," then
this is nothing new, and I woke up from my vaca for nothing.
This is the same thing we've been doing for ages. But if it
involves Horse laying a warning, and then threatening some
action, what action? And I've already suggested that booting
is the wrong administrative action to be taken for the problem
as it seems to be understood.
Nobody has helped clarify that for me. Apparently I just keep
stirring shit up, but I'm a pretty bright guy, and I take the
issue seriously, I'm not just trying to float my boat and do
moral grandstanding. I'm genuinely concerned about the
composition of the MD, and your just pissing down my leg, Ian.
Matt
> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 08:28:56 +0100
> From: ian.glendinning at gmail.com
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Subject: Re: [MD] Decision
>
> Aaaagghhh Matt, There's Horse trying to introduce cooling off and Matt
> give's us one of his yard long screeds ;-)
>
> Anyway the point No, No, No, I'll be brief. You said
> "I'm still not sure why we need to "draw a line" against
> anybody for "clogging up the entire MD bandwidth," but
> maybe there are practical/material/physical/electrical issues"
>
> No you dummy - our bandwidth - the mental traffic, the goodwill, the
> conversation, the tolerance, the intellect, the % of mails on this
> subject in our inboxes.
>
> I repeat ... the message is "give it a rest" Bo.
> Kill this intellectual pattern as instructed.
>
> Ian
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Matt Kundert
> <pirsigaffliction at hotmail.com> wrote: (A Yard of Screed)
> >
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with Hotmail.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list