[MD] Decision

[Ian Glendinning]

We got there in the end Matt.

Like you, I can switch off from Bo (or Platt) - so can anyone.
This is Horse's thread, not Bo's. A decision as moderator to not
simply ignore him, but exactly as per your own advice,

to tell Bo to "shut the fuck up".

Ian

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Matt Kundert
<pirsigaffliction at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Heh, I had a feeling it _was_ a metaphor, but ya' know,
> just in case there was some hardware issue.  What the hell
> do I know?
>
> And I guess I'll reiterate since it isn't: delete the fucking
> emails.
>
> If you are too retarded to take the proper measures to
> control your own psychic resources (and it took me a
> while to learn how to do it), then maybe you aren't cut
> out for talking to people.  Because I still do not think it is
> a good administrative move to take any action.
>
> That's the thing I need clarification on and for which, Ian,
> you didn't help very well at all.  So, thanks for making me
> repeat myself again.
>
> What are we talking about?  What options for _action_ are
> we talking about?  Administrative actions?  Horse puts
> down--as an administrator, and not as a regular poster--a
> warning.  What if Bo violates it?  What are we talking about?
> If it just involves asking Bo, "Please, shut the fuck up," then
> this is nothing new, and I woke up from my vaca for nothing.
> This is the same thing we've been doing for ages.  But if it
> involves Horse laying a warning, and then threatening some
> action, what action?  And I've already suggested that booting
> is the wrong administrative action to be taken for the problem
> as it seems to be understood.
>
> Nobody has helped clarify that for me.  Apparently I just keep
> stirring shit up, but I'm a pretty bright guy, and I take the
> issue seriously, I'm not just trying to float my boat and do
> moral grandstanding.  I'm genuinely concerned about the
> composition of the MD, and your just pissing down my leg, Ian.
>
> Matt
>
>> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 08:28:56 +0100
>> From: ian.glendinning at gmail.com
>> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>> Subject: Re: [MD] Decision
>>
>> Aaaagghhh Matt, There's Horse trying to introduce cooling off and Matt
>> give's us one of his yard long screeds ;-)
>>
>> Anyway the point No, No, No, I'll be brief. You said
>> "I'm still not sure why we need to "draw a line" against
>> anybody for "clogging up the entire MD bandwidth," but
>> maybe there are practical/material/physical/electrical issues"
>>
>> No you dummy - our bandwidth - the mental traffic, the goodwill, the
>> conversation, the tolerance, the intellect, the % of mails on this
>> subject in our inboxes.
>>
>> I repeat ... the message is "give it a rest" Bo.
>> Kill this intellectual pattern as instructed.
>>
>> Ian
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Matt Kundert
>> <pirsigaffliction at hotmail.com> wrote: (A Yard of Screed)
>> >
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with Hotmail.
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>