[MD] A larger system of understanding

[Ian Glendinning]

Of course this whole thread is another dishonest smokescreen by Platt
to divert attention away from the issue he neatly sidestepped (again):

Having quote Bob in "defence" of Bo and Platt in Lila's Child

 "God knows the MOQ has never had two better friends than Bo and
Platt, so this is no criticism of their otherwise brilliant thinking.

Whilst selectively ignoring the very next sentence from Bob,

 "It's just that I see a lowering of the quality of the MOQ itself if
you follow this path"

Now that Bo has maybe taken "damned by faint praise" hint, time to
address the real problem.

Those who muddy the waters with straw-men and bogey-men to their own
deliberate and politically motivated ends.

Platt, please stand up.
Firing squad, take aim.
(Come the revolution.)

Regards
Ian



On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:35 AM, Dan Glover <daneglover at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:21 AM,  <plattholden at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> Pirsig quote as further evidence that including the MOQ in the intellectual level doesn't make sense.
>>Platt:
>> If thus expressing my opinion gets me banned from mog_discuss, so be it. But, I
>> hope not and look forward to comments. .
>
> Dan:
> Quit being a cry baby.
>
> Please.
>
> Dan
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>