[MD] inorganic patterns & thinking

[Magnus Berg]

Hi Marsha and Craig

I'm with Craig on this. I'd like to rephrase Marsha's:

"Pluto is real if man measures it to be real"

into

"Pluto is real to man, if man measures it to be real"

That "to man" is not an underlying assumption of the MoQ, but some here 
seem to think it is.

Also, to restart the answer without involving Pluto, then yes, there is 
a direct relationship from inorganic patterns all the way up to the 
intellectual patterns required for thinking. That relationship is the 
dependency between the levels.

	Magnus




On 2010-07-19 04:59, craigerb at comcast.net wrote:
> [Marsha]
>> Pluto is real if man measures it to be real, and if man measures
>> a muon to be real it becomes real.
>> It seems to me thinking has a relationship within that measuring process
>> all the way down.
>
> .
> I think the view that "everything that is measured real is real",
> has the same weakness as "whatever is verified as true is true".
> Sooner or later you have to admit your mistake.
>
>
>
>
>
> Craig
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html