[MD] inorganic patterns & thinking

[MarshaV]

On Jul 19, 2010, at 2:36 AM, Magnus Berg wrote:

> Hi Marsha and Craig
> 
> I'm with Craig on this. I'd like to rephrase Marsha's:
> 
> "Pluto is real if man measures it to be real"
> 
> into
> 
> "Pluto is real to man, if man measures it to be real"
> 
> That "to man" is not an underlying assumption of the MoQ, but some here seem to think it is.
> 
> Also, to restart the answer without involving Pluto, then yes, there is a direct relationship from inorganic patterns all the way up to the intellectual patterns required for thinking. That relationship is the dependency between the levels.
> 
> 	Magnus


You'll have  to explain your last sentence.  Why is thinking only in 
relationship with patterns in the dependency between levels?  


Marsha  





> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 2010-07-19 04:59, craigerb at comcast.net wrote:
>> [Marsha]
>>> Pluto is real if man measures it to be real, and if man measures
>>> a muon to be real it becomes real.
>>> It seems to me thinking has a relationship within that measuring process
>>> all the way down.
>> 
>> .
>> I think the view that "everything that is measured real is real",
>> has the same weakness as "whatever is verified as true is true".
>> Sooner or later you have to admit your mistake.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Craig
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___