[MD] Social Intellectual

[MarshaV]

On Jul 21, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote:

> Jeez Marsha, you have successfully changed the thread.


Right!  Your "(to Boristotlists or SIMians)" was just a bit of kindness 
and understanding.  

whatever...   


Marsha 




> 
> I was supporting a statement of Bo's and asking what words he would use. End of.
> 
> If you want to argue as to whether posts contain "just" words - please
> start another thread ... you yourself detected "violence" in the posts
> - in your own words. If you want to comment about "some people's"
> behaviour in general, please stop addressing them to me ... or I may
> take offence ;-)




> 
> Ian
> 
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:46 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Ian,
>> 
>> Develop meditation first, and then your questions will change, and you
>> may understand the answers differently.  I do not get the violence, by some,
>> towards Bo.  It represents such disharmony, whether he is understood or
>> not.  After all these posts ARE comprised of "just" words.  I think nobody on
>> this list gets that these are just bits and pieces of pattern, and not swords
>> and rocks.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jul 21, 2010, at 6:17 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote:
>> 
>>> Yes, Marsha, I understand you - I can see problems with the words (all
>>> words in fact) I use zillions of scare quotes etc ...
>>> 
>>> But having meditated what word do you suggest I /we use in the next
>>> email or are we to meditate INSTEAD OF communicate in words.
>>> 
>>> Ian
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:59 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Jul 21, 2010, at 3:53 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Just using the accepted word - "manipulation of symbols" - Marsha
>>>> 
>>>> whatever...
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The point of the question V is say it in your words.
>>>>> What these subjects and objects are .... words in sentences ?
>>>> 
>>>> Self and objects are a case of mistaken identity.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> variables in equations ? representing concepts ? If you don't like the
>>>>> language - stop complaining and make a positive suggestion.
>>>> 
>>>> The word 'held' also presumes someone to hold subjects and objects.
>>>> Really, you should try meditation and see for yourself.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Ian
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:28 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jul 21, 2010, at 2:39 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> In your words - without resorting to the word mind - how are these
>>>>>>> subjects and objects held, manipulated, in intellect ?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Ian,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Seems that your question assumes a manipulator.  Maybe an intellect
>>>>>> can be considered a collection of favored intellectual patterns?  Favored
>>>>>> by an individual or community.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Marsha
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ___
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___