[MD] now it comes

[david buchanan]

dmb said:
... The relationship between subjects and objects simply is not the same as the relationship between dynamic reality and static concepts (between DQ and sq).

Bo replied:
Right, who claims that the S/O relationship is the same as the DQ/SQ one? And moreover who says that SQ are "static concepts"? except DMB. It is inorganic, biological, social  and intellectual patterns, only at intellect is it reality vs concepts and if this SOM's is equalized with DQ/SQ all hell is loose as it has been long in the weak camp.

dmb says:

Oh, for Pete's sake! I am denying the that the relationship is the same because that's what you have accused me of saying they are the same. You repeated that charge above. If SOM is equalized with DQ/sq all hell breaks loose, you say. This is the position of the weak camp, you say.

Am I am telling you that this is NOT what I'm saying. I've explained over and over again what I am trying to say and that is most certainly NOT it. 

I'm totally convinced that some people are simply not capable of discussing the MOQ and you sir are one of them. You have no business doing philosophy. You're even confused about the meaning of your own assertions! I don't mean to be cruel but life is too short, Bo. I'm not gonna waste my time trying to reason with unreasonable people. Shame on me for being fooled again. 

  
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccount&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4