[MD] Bo's weak versus strong interpretation of quantum physiks

[Magnus Berg]

> [Krimel]
> The cogito is a simple statement: "I think therefore, I am." In formulating
> it Descartes was seeking an answer to skeptics. I would not deny that 17th
> century French culture influenced him in this effort and that Descartes is a
> product of 17th century culture; but I don't think it is at all accurate to
> say that the cogito rests on the assumptions of 17th century French culture.
> In fact Descartes' aim was to construct a statement that would hold true
> regardless of the assumptions one has or the culture one participates in.
> Nor is the statement's validity altered in any way by the MoQ.

So you keep saying. But you don't think the levels are real, whereas I do.

Let me ask you this then. *If* the levels were discrete and dependent, 
would you agree that the Descarte statement would be changed into what I 
said yesterday?

I think (I (subject), experience the ideas (object) in my brain)
therefore I exist in the same stack in which my physical brain resides. 
Because ideas are intellectual patterns and all patterns are dependent 
on lower level patterns.

	Magnus