[MD] DMB and Me

[X Acto]

"the process of defining dynamic quality" implies that DQ is primary..



----- Original Message ----
From: Steven Peterson <peterson.steve at gmail.com>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Fri, March 19, 2010 2:16:36 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] DMB and Me

Hi Matt,

> Steve said:
> [Quality] is undefined because it is inexhaustably
> describable.
>
> Matt:
> This is awesome because it never occurred to me to gloss
> Quality's undefinition this way.  I've been glossing it as
> anti-essence for years, but this takes a big leap forward
> (at least in terms of integrating Pirsig and Rorty, which I
> don't require everyone to care about).  Way to go, Steve.

I got it from this LC annotation:

RMP:
Dynamic Quality is defined constantly by everyone. Consciousness can
be described is a
process of defining Dynamic Quality. But once the definitions emerge
they are static
patterns and no longer apply to Dynamic Quality. So one can say
correctly that Dynamic
Quality is both infinitely definable and undefinable because
definition never exhausts it.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html