[MD] DMB and Me

[Matt Kundert]

and?

> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:56:35 -0700
> From: xacto at rocketmail.com
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Subject: Re: [MD] DMB and Me
> 
> "the process of defining dynamic quality" implies that DQ is primary..
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Steven Peterson <peterson.steve at gmail.com>
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Sent: Fri, March 19, 2010 2:16:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [MD] DMB and Me
> 
> Hi Matt,
> 
> > Steve said:
> > [Quality] is undefined because it is inexhaustably
> > describable.
> >
> > Matt:
> > This is awesome because it never occurred to me to gloss
> > Quality's undefinition this way.  I've been glossing it as
> > anti-essence for years, but this takes a big leap forward
> > (at least in terms of integrating Pirsig and Rorty, which I
> > don't require everyone to care about).  Way to go, Steve.
> 
> I got it from this LC annotation:
> 
> RMP:
> Dynamic Quality is defined constantly by everyone. Consciousness can
> be described is a
> process of defining Dynamic Quality. But once the definitions emerge
> they are static
> patterns and no longer apply to Dynamic Quality. So one can say
> correctly that Dynamic
> Quality is both infinitely definable and undefinable because
> definition never exhausts it.
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
> 
> 
>       
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID27925::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:032010_1