[MD] DMB and Me

[X Acto]

Andre said to Bo:
You equate 'dynamic' with 'objective' and 'static' with 'subjective'. This is not a good way to understand these terms, nor is it a good way to understand to MoQ and reinforces my point above that you do not understand DQ/SQ.( with all respect)



dmb says:

Right, if dynamic and static are equated to objective and subjective then you've put the problem right back where it was. DQ/sq replaces SOM. If they're equated, then you just have SOM replacing SOM. Clearly, there is no point in doing anything like that. 

Ron:
And the fuss seems to be about not liking to assert DQ as as primary because it tastes something like the same sort of thang..

I can appreciate the fear..but emphasis aint preferance, an understanding of process more like it, an understanding of the intigration,

providing a kind of insight and reflection relative to living. Real philosophy has it's utility when facing problems in living.

Language and rhetoric are Matts strong suits, it's not only his Philosophic belief but his strategum and method, he stresses the art of conversation.

Though it seems like you've both reached a point where you guys typically shut down the conversation, and I have been enjoying it,

perhaps droping to more simple terms, dropping the quotes and the word smithing ..and you both can weave a narritative.

Plain spoken


                        
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID27925::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:032010_1
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html