[MD] DMB and Me

[skutvik at online.no]

DMB and Group

20 March:

Andre had said to Bo:

> You equate 'dynamic' with 'objective' and 'static' with 'subjective'.
> This is not a good way to understand these terms, nor is it a good way
> to understand to MoQ and reinforces my point above that you do not
> understand DQ/SQ.( with all respect)

I have NOT equated DQ/SQ with Objective/Subjective! This is what I 
accuse Pirsig of by introducing the Quality/MOQ "meta-metaphysics". 
He admittedly says (in the Summary) that Quality is dynamic and the 
MOQ is static but this is just a thin Q-guise over saying that Quality is 
the one real (objective) reality while everything written about it is 
something JUST or subjective.     

dmb says:
> Right, if dynamic and static are equated to objective and subjective
> then you've put the problem right back where it was. DQ/sq replaces
> SOM. If they're equated, then you just have SOM replacing SOM.
> Clearly, there is no point in doing anything like that. 

I couldn't agree more - this is my very point - only it's not me who do 
this, but the latter-day Pirsig by denigrating the MOQ to be "static" - 
totally nonsensical because it is the DQ/SQ "system""

Bodvar 














> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your
> inbox.
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID27925::T:WLMTAG
> L:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:032010_1 Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo,
> Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
> 
>