[MD] DMB and Me

[skutvik at online.no]

Hi Marsha

Sun Mar. 21 
 
Bo before (to DMB): 
> > Yes, DQ is the dynamic aspect - the cutting edge, immediate 
> > experience - if you prefer. And yes, it's prior to language (as a social
> > pattern) because it's prior to all static levels, the point is that
> > Quality/Concepts does NOT correspond to the DQ/SQ.   
 
Marsha:
> I agree with you, concepts do not correspond to static quality, although
> static patterns would seem to include concepts.  Or do you disagree with
> this?  

I agree absolutely with this and no "but", just let me expand a little on 
things in general. The MOQ's first axiom is "Reality is Quality". 
However, dynamic and static are mere different forms of quality (like 
ice and liquid are of water)  thus this axiom can safely be expanded to 
say: "Reality is DQ/SQ" This way the destructive "Quality//DQ/SQ 
meta-metaphysics is avoided and all these mind-boggling buchanan 
exercises are left nil and void.      

>  I think there's no way of confining static patterns to this or that.  

I guess you mean "dynamic"? Anyway the MOQ says that reality is this 
dynamic/static interaction, thus the MOQ itself is neither dynamic or 
static because it IS the realization of this context. It will certainly evolve 
and expand - we are already in the process of doing so - but the 
fundamental DQ/SQ constellation will remain lest it all turns absurd.


Bodvar