[MD] DMB and Me

[MarshaV]

On Mar 22, 2010, at 5:43 AM, skutvik at online.no wrote:

> Hi Marsha
> 
> Sun Mar. 21 
> 
> Bo before (to DMB): 
>>> Yes, DQ is the dynamic aspect - the cutting edge, immediate 
>>> experience - if you prefer. And yes, it's prior to language (as a social
>>> pattern) because it's prior to all static levels, the point is that
>>> Quality/Concepts does NOT correspond to the DQ/SQ.   
> 
> Marsha:
>> I agree with you, concepts do not correspond to static quality, although
>> static patterns would seem to include concepts.  Or do you disagree with
>> this?  
> 
> I agree absolutely with this and no "but", just let me expand a little on 
> things in general. The MOQ's first axiom is "Reality is Quality". 
> However, dynamic and static are mere different forms of quality (like 
> ice and liquid are of water)  thus this axiom can safely be expanded to 
> say: "Reality is DQ/SQ" This way the destructive "Quality//DQ/SQ 
> meta-metaphysics is avoided and all these mind-boggling buchanan 
> exercises are left nil and void.      
> 
>> I think there's no way of confining static patterns to this or that.  
> 
> I guess you mean "dynamic"? Anyway the MOQ says that reality is this 
> dynamic/static interaction, thus the MOQ itself is neither dynamic or 
> static because it IS the realization of this context. It will certainly evolve 
> and expand - we are already in the process of doing so - but the 
> fundamental DQ/SQ constellation will remain lest it all turns absurd.
> 
> 
> Bodvar     
> 


Hi Bo,

Yes, I see it exactly as you state it.  Reality is Quality(DQ/sq), or better stated
from my humble point-of-view:  Reality is Quality(unpatterned experience/ 
patterned experience.)  Reality once was subjects and objects, but now it's 
Quality.

Marsha