[MD] horse pattern, edited

[MarshaV]

Craig,

Properly it should be opposite-from-non-horse.  For me, the horse pattern 
is best represented by opposite-from-non-horse.  The kitten pattern is best
represented by opposite-from-non-kitten, and the justice pattern, by 
opposite-from-non-justice. Yes, it does work for me.

I am not using pattern as a replacement for entity, thing or one of 
Plato's ideal forms.  For me, there is nothing independent or 
permanent about a pattern.   

Non-horse would be all not considered horse, and that seems to me, 
would include kittens, beetles, sharks etc.  


Marsha






On May 2, 2010, at 3:11 AM, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> On May 2, 2010, at 12:32 AM, craigerb at comcast.net wrote:
> 
>> [ Marsha] 
>>> Let's take, for instance, the pattern: horse.  I understand horse to 
>>> be a biological static pattern of value.  It's also best for me to 
>>> understand it as opposite-of-non-horse. 
>> 
>> I wonder if it is the best understanding for you or even a good understanding. 
>> What are biological non-horses for you: kittens, beetles, sharks, and so on? 
>> So if you were trying to understand the spov 'horse' & all you understood 
>> was that it was the opposite of kitten, beetle, shark and so on, 
>> would you have your current u nderstanding of 'horse'?  I say no . 
> 
>> Craig   
> 
> 
> 
> Craig,
> 
> Properly it should be opposite-from-non-horse.  For me, the horse patterns 
> is best represented by opposite-from-non-horse.  The kitten patterns is best
> represented by opposite-from-non-kitten, and the justice pattern, by 
> opposite-from-non-justice.  It works for me yes.
> 
> Non-horse would be all not considered horse, and that seems to me, 
> would include kittens, beetles, sharks etc.
> 
> 
> Marsha
> 
> ___
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___