[MD] horse pattern

[MarshaV]

On May 2, 2010, at 12:32 AM, craigerb at comcast.net wrote:

> [ Marsha] 
>> Let's take, for instance, the pattern: horse.  I understand horse to 
>> be a biological static pattern of value.  It's also best for me to 
>> understand it as opposite-of-non-horse. 
> 
> I wonder if it is the best understanding for you or even a good understanding. 
> What are biological non-horses for you: kittens, beetles, sharks, and so on? 
> So if you were trying to understand the spov 'horse' & all you understood 
> was that it was the opposite of kitten, beetle, shark and so on, 
> would you have your current u nderstanding of 'horse'?  I say no . 

> Craig   



Craig,

Properly it should be opposite-from-non-horse.  For me, the horse patterns 
is best represented by opposite-from-non-horse.  The kitten patterns is best
represented by opposite-from-non-kitten, and the justice pattern, by 
opposite-from-non-justice.  It works for me yes.

Non-horse would be all not considered horse, and that seems to me, 
would include kittens, beetles, sharks etc.


Marsha
 
___