[MD] Ham's theory of Truth

[Mary]

Hello Marsha,

> 
> I understand the only way towards an Ultimate Truth is to discover the
> falseness of static patterns(experience): not this, not that.   There
> is no permanence to static patterns(experience) so in what sense could
> they ever be true.  Could it be that patterns that last longer are
> somehow more true?  But that would mean time is the measure of truth,
> and time is itself a static pattern of value.
> 
> 
[Mary Replies] 
Yes.  We would do well to contemplate the idea that time itself is a static
pattern of value.  

Even SOM has been able to discern as much by arriving at the Heisenburg
Uncertainty Principle through SOMish methods.  The hilarious absurdity of
this should be telling us something.

Through SOM we arrived at the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.  This should
tell us that there was a "time" when time was meaningless.  All the static
patterns built up on top of this idea of time are false.  The foundation
upon which these patterns are built is clay.

Mary