[MD] the sophists

[MarshaV]

When, Arlo,  
On May 14, 2010, at 8:52 AM, you wrote:  
> He later formalizes the term "SOM" to describe the opposing traditions of dominance in Western thought, but to suggest in any way that the Sophists were peddling "SOM" is ridiculous. Indeed, Marsha, if you're gonna bend over that far to make SOL work for you, I suggest a new career in the circus.


and associated my ideas with a circus, you pretty much ended 
any kind of intellectual discussion.  


Marsha





On May 14, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Arlo Bensinger wrote:

> [Marsha]
> Your interpretation is, I'm sure, quite clear to you.  Mine is quite clear to me.
> 
> [Arlo]
> Actually, I think he is condemning lemon meringue pie, and that's quite clear to me, la-la-la-la-la-la...
> 
> ""Man is not the source of all things, as the subjective idealists would say. Nor is he the passive observer of all things, as the objective idealists and materialists would say." (ZMM)
> 
> Yeah, you're right, this has nothing to do with "SOM", or how the Sophists were advancing a non-S/O intellectual understanding. I think he is saying he likes vanilla ice cream with his apple pie.
> 
> [Marsha]
> It is not rationalizing my way out of a dialogue, but quitting a fools game.
> 
> [Arlo]
> I think the point of the book was that a "game" is how you play it. If you want it to be about escape and denial, then that's what it will be about.
> 
> [Marsha]
> Bye...
> 
> [Arlo]
> Woof.
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___