[MD] hawking radiation

[MarshaV]

Hi Adrie,

To be fair, I felt I really needed to watch the 2nd program in the 'Into 
The Universe with Stephen Hawkings' series.  It was about time travel and 
was much better.  The first show was about aliens, and with its imaginary 
animated creatures seemed pretty lame, but the Time Travel program 
was much better: worm holes, black holes, etc. .  I've also started to 
watch the 3rd program: 'A Theory of Everything' and it seems very 
interesting and the graphics are very good.


Marsha
 
  




On May 17, 2010, at 6:09 AM, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> 
> No offense, Adrie, but anyone can point to wikipedia.  Are you a physicist?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On May 17, 2010, at 5:27 AM, Fam. Kintziger-Karaca wrote:
> 
>> Ahh, but the Cern Adventure is suppose to prove Hawking's unification theory ;-)
>> 
>> Hawking is not a driving force behind the unification theory.
>> 
>> cern is not to prove or try out the unificationmodel.
>> 
>> cern is about exploring the boundaries of the standard model, going to the edge.
>> 
>> 
>> some of this hawking black hole explanation is to be found here
>> 
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation
>> 
>> dave;
>> ;> dynamic can only exist if static is first,...
>> 
>> Wrong!
>> 
>> "Although Dynamic Quality, the Quality of freedom, CREATES THE WORLD IN
>> WHICH WE LIVE, these patterns of static quality, the quality of order,
>> preserve our world. Neither Static nor Dynamic Quality can survive without
>> the other." Lila 179 (MY EMPHASIS)
>> 
>> 
>> Or Bassackwards! 
>> 
>> Static patterns emerge out of and can only exist if there is dynamic source!
>> However all static patterns have some degree of dynamism in them. That is
>> why sometimes RMP uses stable instead of static. "Stable" is a better
>> portrayal of the reality of patterns that reflects our ability to recognize
>> patterns in the dynamic soup.
>> 
>> Dave
>> 
>> Try to understand dependance, interdependance,and try to abstract physiks from "META"
>> do not switch between the two in your abstraction,try to read my mail again, 
>> then the context of Pirsigs thinking, Static/dynamic/quality,and "dependance" and" interdependence".
>> 
>> try to understand wat you cut copy and paste.
>> if we mindfuck about the hierarcy , we are missing the point.
>> Greetzz, Adrie 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___