[MD] hawking radiation

[MarshaV]

No offense, Adrie, but anyone can point to wikipedia.  Are you a physicist?




On May 17, 2010, at 5:27 AM, Fam. Kintziger-Karaca wrote:

> Ahh, but the Cern Adventure is suppose to prove Hawking's unification theory ;-)
> 
> Hawking is not a driving force behind the unification theory.
> 
> cern is not to prove or try out the unificationmodel.
> 
> cern is about exploring the boundaries of the standard model, going to the edge.
> 
> 
> some of this hawking black hole explanation is to be found here
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation
> 
> dave;
> ;> dynamic can only exist if static is first,...
> 
> Wrong!
> 
> "Although Dynamic Quality, the Quality of freedom, CREATES THE WORLD IN
> WHICH WE LIVE, these patterns of static quality, the quality of order,
> preserve our world. Neither Static nor Dynamic Quality can survive without
> the other." Lila 179 (MY EMPHASIS)
> 
> 
> Or Bassackwards! 
> 
> Static patterns emerge out of and can only exist if there is dynamic source!
> However all static patterns have some degree of dynamism in them. That is
> why sometimes RMP uses stable instead of static. "Stable" is a better
> portrayal of the reality of patterns that reflects our ability to recognize
> patterns in the dynamic soup.
> 
> Dave
> 
> Try to understand dependance, interdependance,and try to abstract physiks from "META"
> do not switch between the two in your abstraction,try to read my mail again, 
> then the context of Pirsigs thinking, Static/dynamic/quality,and "dependance" and" interdependence".
> 
> try to understand wat you cut copy and paste.
> if we mindfuck about the hierarcy , we are missing the point.
> Greetzz, Adrie 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___