[MD] frankly xacto painting

[Frank Booth]

Kind hearted fellow Moqians,

Obviously I'm not versed in philosophy or it's proper terms or any of that fancy pants shit.

"I should have been a pair of ragged claws scuttling along the shores of silent seas..."

And so forth.

I've read Pirsig's and related books numerous times but not for a couple of years. I'm running mainly on instinct. And hard cider.

The hardest cider in aaaaaaaall Meh-hee-ko.

----

When I say "rules" I don't mean rules that we choose to obey.

We follow the "rules" because it is in our nature. It is what one ( or some thing ) does without thinking or choosing.

The "rules" are a consequence of the "specifications".

Or some such shit.

The "specifications" TRUTH ( INTEL ) and LAW ( SOCIO ) and LOVE ( BIO ) specify the empty set.

This makes the specification "strong enough" or "versatile enough" or "dynamic enough" to serve as a static latch.

Otherwise the rules would be dependent on a particular "static" instance of the specification.

Which might go "poof", or "buh bye" and the static latch would be "fucked".

And the whole "fucking level" would "fucking collapse".

Know what I mean?

----

The interplay between static and dynamic seems to be counter-intuitive.

----

Your baby doesn't love you any more
Golden days before they end
Whisper secrets to the wind
Your baby won't be near you any more

Tender nights before they fly
Send falling stars that seem to cry
Your baby doesn't want you any more
It's over

It breaks your heart in two, To know she's been untrue
But oh what will you do? When she says to you
There's someone new We're through We're through
It's over It's over It's over

All the rainbows in the sky
Start to weep, then say goodbye
You won't be seeing rainbows any more
Setting suns before they fall, Echo to you that's all that's all
But you'll see lonely sunsets after all

It's over It's over It's over It's over

~ Roy "fucking" Orbison

----

Just some ideas I don't know how to explain very well.

Over and out.

~ Frank "fucking" Booth





































> THE.
> 
> EXACT.
> 
> SAME.
> 
> PATTERN.
> 
> Love is not a species of emotion. Vice-versa Mr. B.
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcOixjbPC4I
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: "skutvik at online.no" <skutvik at online.no>
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Sent: Thu, May 20, 2010 12:09:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [MD] frankly xacto painting
> 
> Hi Frank 
> 
> 19 May. you wrote:
> 
> > Love is to Biology as Law is to Social as Truth is to Intellectual.
> 
> I drop your colloqualisms, as a "foreigner" I'm out of my depth there.
> However love is an emotion and thus social (sex is biology!). However
> Truth as intellect is spot on. It's the "objectivity" of the
> subject/object distinction. 
> 
> Back to the social and law issue. Of course "law" is ONE mighty social
> pattern, but "emotion" is THE renegade biological pattern that "took
> off on a purpose of its own" to form the social level as a reality of
> its own. There surely were early tribal societies that had no criminal
> law, the emotional bonds were its glue. First it was strictly parent
> child, then family, then klan, then "our cause" (cosa nostra) and the
> rest is the history of increasing social complexity.            
> 
> Bodvar
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
> 


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html