[MD] Equations for Quality

[118]

Hi Andrie,

A new level would be interesting, but that is not where I am going with
this.  A new level would only be another SOM expression.  The attempt at
formulation is to provide a facet to MoQ which can bypass SOM.  This is done
in the metaphysics provided by physics where the intent of the subject and
the intent of the object are entangled and thus both sides disappear (or
combine).

Mark

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:36 AM, ADRIE KINTZIGER <parser666 at gmail.com>wrote:

> adding a new dimension,as an euphemism for a new level?
> ever considered the import of a q-level?
>
> 2010/11/1 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com>
>
> > Hi A,
> >
> >
> > [A]
> > We mentioned The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy earlier. In the story
> > there is this planet where the inhabitants have never thought about the
> > upward direction. They were confined to the two dimensional spherical
> > plane,
> > they had never thought about the three dimensional Euclidian space
> > embedding
> > that plane. But one day they did. I guess THAT would be the DQ in this
> > approach: that is: adding a new dimension.
> >
> > [Mark]
> > That is a good way to put it, adding a new dimension to metaphysics.  It
> > could also be a paradigm shift, but that term is overused in this country
> > and is not well understood, I think.  Yes, awareness of Quality as
> > direction
> > is an added dimension.  Description of that dimension is what we are
> after.
> >  As I have suggested, to formulate such a thing is just a tool, not an
> end
> > in itself.  What it does, is provide discussion through symbol
> > manipulation.
> > Such symbols seem to be easier to work with than the vast number of words
> > at
> > our disposal.  They go right to the heart of the subject, if you will.  I
> > do
> > understand the reticence by many because such symbol manipulation can
> lead
> > to false conclusions which would seem logical, but this happens all the
> > time
> > in physics.  The end equation must be evaluated as to its significance.
>  If
> > nothing else, it leads to further discussion and perhaps insight.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mark
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> parser
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>