[MD] Equations for Quality

[ADRIE KINTZIGER]

adding a new dimension,as an euphemism for a new level?
ever considered the import of a q-level?

2010/11/1 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com>

> Hi A,
>
>
> [A]
> We mentioned The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy earlier. In the story
> there is this planet where the inhabitants have never thought about the
> upward direction. They were confined to the two dimensional spherical
> plane,
> they had never thought about the three dimensional Euclidian space
> embedding
> that plane. But one day they did. I guess THAT would be the DQ in this
> approach: that is: adding a new dimension.
>
> [Mark]
> That is a good way to put it, adding a new dimension to metaphysics.  It
> could also be a paradigm shift, but that term is overused in this country
> and is not well understood, I think.  Yes, awareness of Quality as
> direction
> is an added dimension.  Description of that dimension is what we are after.
>  As I have suggested, to formulate such a thing is just a tool, not an end
> in itself.  What it does, is provide discussion through symbol
> manipulation.
> Such symbols seem to be easier to work with than the vast number of words
> at
> our disposal.  They go right to the heart of the subject, if you will.  I
> do
> understand the reticence by many because such symbol manipulation can lead
> to false conclusions which would seem logical, but this happens all the
> time
> in physics.  The end equation must be evaluated as to its significance.  If
> nothing else, it leads to further discussion and perhaps insight.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser